HOME l SIGN UP l CONTACT US l SITE MAP               Protecting Alaska's Cook Inlet watershed and the life it sustains

 

DONATE NOW!

Report  pollution & habitat destruction:  Call Inletkeeper's Hotline

1-888-MY-INLET (694-6538) or click here

 

 

Salmon Stream Monitoring Program

 

Temperature

 

Macroinvertebrates

 

Impervious Cover

 

Phosphorus

 

Discharge/Turbidity

 

Reports/Presentations

 

Technical Advisory Committee

 

Study Area

 
 
     
 
 
       

 

Cook Inletkeeper
Salmon Stream Monitoring Program

Impervious Cover

 

NEW Report! Press Release & Report

On March 19, 2007, Cook Inletkeeper released an important new report, entitled Mapping Impervious Cover to Correlate Land Use Activities with Salmon Health & Habitat on the Lower Kenai Peninsula, which documents how much impervious cover exists in the Deep Creek, Ninilchik River, Stariski Creek, and Anchor River watersheds. The amount of impervious cover in a watershed provides a good estimate of potential development pressures on local waterbodies, and national studies show that impervious surfaces are reliable indicators of fish habitat and water quality.  See the Press Release and the Report.

BACKGROUND

Impervious surfaces are exposed areas where vegetation has been removed and barren soil and/or gravel is obvious. Impervious surfaces include roads, buildings, clustered cars, driveways, and gravel pits. As the amount of impervious surface cover in a landscape increases, a chain of events begins that alters the way water is transported and stored, thereby affecting the entire local water cycle. Once this chain of events commences, the effects are far-reaching, and can result in degraded fish and wildlife habitat, decreased water quality, and impacts to nearshore estuarine habitat.  

National studies show that impervious surfaces are reliable indicators of fish habitat and water quality.  In many regions of the country, as little as 10% impervious cover in a watershed has been linked to stream degradation, with the degradation becoming more severe as impervious cover increases.  A more recent urbanization study conducted by the U. S. Geological Survey in five watersheds in Anchorage, Alaska, however, found cause for concern from impervious cover at much lower levels:  4.4 –5.8% impervious area (Ourso and Frenzel, 2003). 

INLETKEEPER STRATEGIES

Cook Inletkeeper, with GIS-support from the Kenai Watershed Forum, has determined how much impervious cover there is in the Deep Creek, Ninilchik River, Stariski Creek, and Anchor River watersheds. The results are hot off the press: these watersheds have less than 2.6% impervious cover presently. The Ninilchik and Anchor Point areas have the greatest concentration of hard surfaces; the upper reaches of Deep Creek have the least. In this analysis, seismic lines and trails were not included in the impervious cover calculations. 

The results of this analysis provide important baseline information to understand future population and economic growth. We now understand where we are on the curve of development, which provides unique insights for natural resource planning, and habitat and water quality monitoring. In 2006, Inletkeeper analyzed differences in water quality, water quantity and macroinvertebrate data between developed and undeveloped portions of the watersheds.  The results of this work can be found in Inletkeeper's report, Mapping Impervious Cover to Correlate Land Use Activities with Salmon Health & Habitat on the Lower Kenai Peninsula.

Importantly, we used new methodology for obtaining GIS impervious cover data. Traditionally, such data has been obtained through the laborious task of hand-held digitizing.  This project relied on new GIS software which identifies unique attributes of raster data in satellite imagery, and which translates this data to reliable impervious surface coverages.  As satellite imagery improves, this method will become an important and accessible tool for communities throughout Alaska. 

FUTURE WORK 

This effort provides resource agencies with a clear understanding as to where impervious cover currently exists and gives them a tool to track this environmental indicator and help prevent the loss of sensitive and necessary habitat.  Impervious cover analysis should be undertaken again in 5 – 10 years in this fast-growing region, and monitoring work should be planned to provide data for the same time period as the new imagery. 

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES & LINKS (links open in new window)

 

Ourso, R.T., and S.A. Frenzel. 2003. Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska. Hydrobiologia 501(July):117-131. Abstract available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026211808745

  

 

 
   
 
   

 Report  pollution & habitat destruction:  Call Inletkeeper's Hotline 1-888-MY-INLET (694-6538) or click here

 

 

 

Lower Inlet Office (Headquarters)

PO Box 3269 / 3734 Ben Walters Lane

Homer, Alaska  99603

tel. 907.235.4068     fax 907.235.4069

keeper@inletkeeper.org

 

Upper Inlet Office

308 G St., Suite 219

    Anchorage, AK 99501

tel. 907.929.9371    fax 907.929.1562

keeper@inletkeeper.org

 

©2008  Cook Inletkeeper  Last Updated  01/22/2008  

 

About Us l Programs l Take Action l News & Events l Support l Resources

JavaScript Menu Courtesy of Milonic.com